linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Add SM6375 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fcf8368c-7423-a350-c637-86b9adecaca1@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:15:39 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Cc:     martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Add SM6375 compatible

On 21/09/2022 02:45, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Add a compatible for the SM6375 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - changed the compatible to match the style used in the file
> 
>   drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
> index 413f9f4ae9cd..15671a917fb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smd_rpm_of_match[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpm-sdm660" },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpm-sm6115" },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpm-sm6125" },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpm-sm6375" },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpm-qcm2290" },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpm-qcs404" },
>   	{}

Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>