[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b49de03c-2d88-ad81-7bdb-a33e6841481e@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:17:33 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: Similar SoCs with different CPUs and interrupt bindings
On 21/09/2022 12:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> +#define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(na) (na + 32)
>> +#define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(nr, na) GIC_SPI nr SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(na)
>> / {
>> compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043";
>> #address-cells = <2>;
>> @@ -128,7 +130,7 @@ ssi1: ssi@...4a000 {
>> compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-ssi",
>> "renesas,rz-ssi";
>> reg = <0 0x1004a000 0 0x400>;
>> - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 330 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> + interrupts = <SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(330, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
>>
>>
>>
>> Or any other method like that....
>
> Which will generate the text:
>
> "interrupts = <GIC_SPI 330 (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH + 32)>,"
>
> (give or take some whitespace)
>
> CPP supports constant expressions in #if and #elif directives, but
> macros are purely literal text replacement. It might technically be
> achievable with some insane CPP metaprogramming, but for all practical
> purposes this is a non-starter unless dtc itself grows the ability to
> process arithmetic expressions.
Except I put it into flags, not to IRQ number, it works, so I am not
sure why do you call it non-starter?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists