[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YysNW3+Fc2zOYcCq@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:10:51 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...as.de,
puwen@...on.cn, mario.limonciello@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, gpiccoli@...lia.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, ananth.narayan@....com,
gautham.shenoy@....com, Calvin Ong <calvin.ong@....com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor_idle: Skip dummy wait for processors
based on the Zen microarchitecture
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 04:09:16PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> I was not aware of cpu_feature_enabled() and it makes perfect sense to
> use it here.
It is no difference what the callers use - we simply want to unify the
interfaces and not have boot_cpu* and cpu_feature_* and so on. One is
enough and we want to use cpu_feature_enabled() everywhere possible.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists