lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:44:08 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: cdev: add fdinfo output for line request file
 descriptors

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:35:25PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 7:19 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 03:54:35PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

...

> > > +     seq_printf(out, "gpio-device:\t%s\n", dev_name(dev));
> > > +
> > > +     for (i = 0; i < lr->num_lines; i++)
> > > +             seq_printf(out, "gpio-line:\t%d\n",
> > > +                        gpio_chip_hwgpio(lr->lines[i].desc));
> >
> > Hmm... Not sure which variant is better (as for machine parsing and for human),
> > but I was thinking of
> 
> IMO it's pretty clear that the variant in this patch is easier for
> machine parsing - one less tokenization.

For human it's harder in my opinion... But okay.

> >         gpio-lines: 1,4,6, ...
> >
> > Also don't forget that sizes over PAGE_SIZE in sysfs sometimes problematic and
> > racy.(the commit 888be6067b97 ("ACPI: sysfs: Fix a buffer overrun problem with
> > description_show()") for the reference).
> 
> In most systems PAGE_SIZE will be at least 4096 bytes. With this patch
> a single "gpio-line:\t65535\n" is at most 17 bytes long x max 64 lines
> = 1088 bytes. We're still way below the size where it would be
> problematic.

Okay, for now it's 64, but it will be problematic starting from ~300 requested
lines. Also, in case we add something more, who knows?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ