[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yyso42iP40niLTxO@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:08:19 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
mike.leach@...aro.org, leo.yan@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] arm64: defconfig: Add Coresight as module
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 03:05:34PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> As suggested by Catalin here's the change to add Coresight to defconfig.
>
> Unfortunately I don't think we should add CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X
> which builds a few files until [1] is merged because of the overhead
> of CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211021134530.206216-1-leo.yan@linaro.org/T/
I thought the overhead wasn't the problem, it's mostly negligible. We
can probably save a few more cycles on the __switch_to() path by
replacing several isb()s in those functions with a single one just
before cpu_switch_to().
IIRC the issue is that unless a process runs in the root pid namespace,
the actual pid written to contextidr is meaningless.
Now that you reminded me of that thread, I see three options (sorry, not
entirely related to the defconfig updates):
1. Remove CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR and corresponding code completely,
find other events to correlate the task with the trace.
2. Always on CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR (we might as well remove the
Kconfig entry). This would write the root pid namespace value
(task_pid_nr()).
3. Similar to (2) but instead write task_pid_nr_ns(). An alternative
here is to write -1 if the task is not in the root pid namespace.
Strong preference for (1).
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists