[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88c17568-8694-940a-0f1f-9d345e8dcbdb@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:01:46 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...as.de, puwen@...on.cn,
mario.limonciello@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, gpiccoli@...lia.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, ananth.narayan@....com,
gautham.shenoy@....com, Calvin Ong <calvin.ong@....com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor_idle: Skip dummy wait for processors
based on the Zen microarchitecture
On 9/22/22 09:54, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>
> On 9/22/2022 10:14 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 9/20/22 23:36, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>> Cc: regressions@...ts.linux.dev
>> *Is* this a regression?
> On second thought, it is not a regression.
> Will remove the tag on v2.
What were you planning for v2?
Rafael suggested something like the attached patch. It's not nearly as
fragile as the Zen check you proposed earlier.
Any testing or corrections on the commentary would be appreciated.
View attachment "0001-ACPI-processor-idle-Limit-Dummy-wait-workaround-to-o.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2918 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists