[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-0486175c-f1e8-4879-9545-2ccbbc427de9@palmer-ri-x1c9>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: anup@...infault.org
CC: rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, atishp@...shpatra.org,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apatel@...tanamicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: riscv-sbi: Fix CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_xyz() macro usage
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 19:59:45 PDT (-0700), anup@...infault.org wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 2:16 PM Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently, we are using CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM() for all SBI HSM
>> suspend types so retentive suspend types are also treated non-retentive
>> and kernel will do redundant additional work for these states.
>>
>> The BIT[31] of SBI HSM suspend types allows us to differentiate between
>> retentive and non-retentive suspend types so we should use this BIT
>> to call appropriate CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_xyz() macro.
>>
>> Fixes: 6abf32f1d9c5 ("cpuidle: Add RISC-V SBI CPU idle driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
>
> Can you please take this patch through the RISC-V tree ?
Sorry I missed this, I didn't realize you wanted me to merge it. It's
on fixes.
>
> Regards,
> Anup
>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
>> index 1151e5e2ba82..33c92fec4365 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
>> @@ -97,8 +97,13 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
>> {
>> u32 *states = __this_cpu_read(sbi_cpuidle_data.states);
>> + u32 state = states[idx];
>>
>> - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend, idx, states[idx]);
>> + if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
>> + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend, idx, state);
>> + else
>> + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
>> + idx, state);
>> }
>>
>> static int __sbi_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists