lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyyaCoHC95yyJpOK@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:23:22 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, sricharan@...eaurora.org,
        kevin.tian@...el.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] iommu/msm: Fix error-out routine in
 msm_iommu_attach_dev()

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 01:53:44AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> index 6a24aa804ea3..14df722f0060 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,34 @@ static struct iommu_device *msm_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>  	return &iommu->iommu;
>  }
>  
> +static void msm_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +				 struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct msm_priv *priv = to_msm_priv(domain);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct msm_iommu_dev *iommu;
> +	struct msm_iommu_ctx_dev *master;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	free_io_pgtable_ops(priv->iop);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&msm_iommu_lock, flags);
> +	list_for_each_entry(iommu, &priv->list_attached, dom_node) {
> +		ret = __enable_clocks(iommu);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto fail;
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry(master, &iommu->ctx_list, list) {
> +			msm_iommu_free_ctx(iommu->context_map, master->num);
> +			__reset_context(iommu->base, master->num);

This isn't safe if the loop in msm_iommu_attach_dev() exits
early. 

Firstly the it leaves master->num set to -ERRNO so clear_bit will
corrupt memory

Secondly if the attach loop gets half way through the remaining
entries have master->num == 0 and so the clear_bit() will corrupt an
otherwise valid entry.

Fixing all of this properly looks like a big deal, I think we should
drop this patch from the series.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ