[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220922180041.1768141-2-longman@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:00:37 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 1/5] sched: Add __releases annotations to affine_move_task()
affine_move_task() assumes task_rq_lock() has been called and it does
an implicit task_rq_unlock() before returning. Add the appropriate
__releases annotations to make this clear.
A typo error in comment is also fixed.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index ee28253c9ac0..b351e6d173b7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2696,6 +2696,8 @@ void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p)
*/
static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf,
int dest_cpu, unsigned int flags)
+ __releases(rq->lock)
+ __releases(p->pi_lock)
{
struct set_affinity_pending my_pending = { }, *pending = NULL;
bool stop_pending, complete = false;
@@ -3005,7 +3007,7 @@ static int restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p,
/*
* Restrict the CPU affinity of task @p so that it is a subset of
- * task_cpu_possible_mask() and point @p->user_cpu_ptr to a copy of the
+ * task_cpu_possible_mask() and point @p->user_cpus_ptr to a copy of the
* old affinity mask. If the resulting mask is empty, we warn and walk
* up the cpuset hierarchy until we find a suitable mask.
*/
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists