linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 25/30] KVM: x86: Delete kvm_arch_hardware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:20:54 -0700
From:   isaku.yamahata@...el.com
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5 25/30] KVM: x86: Delete kvm_arch_hardware_enable/disable()

From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>

Now they're function call and there is no point to keep them.  Open code
them.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 18 ++++--------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 01687b553915..aa6594de1fc1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static void kvm_on_user_return(struct user_return_notifier *urn)
 
 	/*
 	 * Disabling irqs at this point since the following code could be
-	 * interrupted and executed through kvm_arch_hardware_disable()
+	 * interrupted and executed through hardware_disable()
 	 */
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	if (msrs->registered) {
@@ -11864,11 +11864,6 @@ void kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector);
 
-static int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void)
-{
-	return static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_enable)();
-}
-
 static int __hardware_enable(void);
 
 void kvm_arch_resume(int usage_count)
@@ -11961,12 +11956,6 @@ void kvm_arch_resume(int usage_count)
 	}
 }
 
-static void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void)
-{
-	static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_disable)();
-	drop_user_return_notifiers();
-}
-
 static cpumask_t cpus_hardware_enabled = CPU_MASK_NONE;
 
 static int __hardware_enable(void)
@@ -11978,7 +11967,7 @@ static int __hardware_enable(void)
 
 	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled))
 		return 0;
-	r = kvm_arch_hardware_enable();
+	r = static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_enable)();
 	if (r)
 		pr_warn("kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d failed during %pSb\n",
 			cpu, __builtin_return_address(0));
@@ -12004,7 +11993,8 @@ static void hardware_disable(void *junk)
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled))
 		return;
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled);
-	kvm_arch_hardware_disable();
+	static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_disable)();
+	drop_user_return_notifiers();
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.25.1