[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166387689171.428844.17569339789321559720.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 21:01:37 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Kenny Root <kroot@...gle.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: mte: move register initialization to C
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:20:53 -0700, Evgenii Stepanov wrote:
> From: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
>
> If FEAT_MTE2 is disabled via the arm64.nomte command line argument on a
> CPU that claims to support FEAT_MTE2, the kernel will use Tagged Normal
> in the MAIR. If we interpret arm64.nomte to mean that the CPU does not
> in fact implement FEAT_MTE2, setting the system register like this may
> lead to UNSPECIFIED behavior. Fix it by arranging for MAIR to be set
> in the C function cpu_enable_mte which is called based on the sanitized
> version of the system register.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: mte: move register initialization to C
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/973b9e373306
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists