[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2a0debe-e99f-2259-1cb9-35193c387c82@gotplt.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 16:26:54 -0400
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@...plt.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] fortify: Use __builtin_dynamic_object_size() when
available
On 2022-09-20 15:21, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This adjusts CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE's coverage to include greater runtime
> size checking from GCC and Clang's __builtin_dynamic_object_size(), which
> the compilers can track either via code flow or from __alloc_size() hints.
>
FTR, I ran a linux build using gcc with allyesconfig and
fortify-metrics[1] to get a sense of how much object size coverage would
improve with __builtin_dynamic_object_size. With a total of 3,877
__builtin_object_size calls, about 11.37% succeed in getting a result
that is not (size_t)-1. If they were replaced by
__builtin_dynamic_object_size as this patch proposes, the success rate
improves to 16.25%, which is a ~1.4x improvement.
This is a decent improvement by itself but it can be amplified further
by adding __attribute__((access (...)))[2] to function prototypes and
definitions, especially for functions that take in buffers and their
sizes as arguments since __builtin_dynamic_object_size in gcc is capable
of recognizing that and using it for object size determination (and
hence to fortify calls) within those functions.
Thanks,
Sid
[1] https://github.com/siddhesh/fortify-metrics
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists