linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes for 6.0-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <438db2a8-0b41-23b4-a369-4475bea90795@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:23:08 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     soc@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes for 6.0-rc6

On 9/22/22 14:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 8:17 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 9/22/22 11:13, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> I could pull your Broadcom fixes directly on top if you/Arnd would
>>> prefer that as a solution?
>>
>> Thanks for the offer, no real urgency on my side, if there is a -rc7,
>> maybe Arnd can submit a follow up for ARM SoC fixes, as there is a good
>> chance we will accumulate more of those between -rc6 and then. If not,
>> and Arnd is fine with it, yes please pull mine directly, thanks!
> 
> Yes, that was my plan already, sorry for not making that clearer already:
> 
> I still have a couple of fixes pull requests in a backlog, including
> yours. Since the fixes branch was already large and the rest has
> not been in my tree yet, I decided to send whatever I had already,
> but planned to pick the rest up tomorrow morning to send early next
> week after I get a successful test result from the build bots.

Works for me, thanks!
-- 
Florian