[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyziD28RXkBugT8e@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:30:39 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Avoid setting BIT_ULL(-1) to
pmu->host_cross_mapped_mask
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
> + hw_idx = pmc->perf_event->hw.idx;
> + /* make it a little less dependent on perf's exact behavior */
Reworded this to explain how a negative value can be encountered.
> + if (hw_idx != pmc->idx && hw_idx > -1)
> + pmu->host_cross_mapped_mask |= BIT_ULL(hw_idx);
> }
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists