[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fd1d8b1-9f43-eb03-4a7f-187723d1c483@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 16:56:08 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Cc: agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de,
pankydev8@...il.com, gost.dev@...sung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Johannes.Thumshirn@....com, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
matias.bjorling@....com
Subject: Re: Please further explain Linux's "zoned storage" roadmap [was: Re:
[PATCH v14 00/13] support zoned block devices with non-power-of-2 zone sizes]
On 9/21/22 16:55, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> But again, that all depends on if Pankaj patch series is accepted, that
> is, on everybody accepting that we lift the power-of-2 zone size constraint.
The companies that are busy with implementing zoned storage for UFS
devices are asking for kernel support for non-power-of-2 zone sizes.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists