linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] Staging: rtl8192e: fix coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YywbiMrkZa3ELJlb@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:23:36 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Anjandev Momi <anjan@...i.ca>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] Staging: rtl8192e: fix coding style issues

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 03:59:19AM -0400, Anjandev Momi wrote:
> This patch series fixes various checkpatch.pl issues: removes unnecessary
> parentheses, removes multiple blank lines, aligns multiple line function calls
> to open paranthesis, and adds a blank line after function declaration.
> 
> Anjandev Momi (4):
>   Staging: rtl8192e: remove unnecessary parentheses
>   Staging: rtl8192e: remove multiple blank lines
>   Staging: rtl8192e: make alignment match open parenthesis
>   Staging: rtl8192e: add blank line after function declaration
> 
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.36.2
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done
  here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot