[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07d37df2-246e-70ea-4a9f-e33354d8864d@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:04:09 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
mike.leach@...aro.org, leo.yan@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: defconfig: Add Coresight as module
On 21/09/2022 17:46, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 04:26:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 03:05:35PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>>
>>> +CONFIG_CORESIGHT_CTI=m
>>> +CONFIG_CORESIGHT_CTI_INTEGRATION_REGS=y
>>
>
> I agree - integration registers should not be enabled by default.
>
>> Do we want this turned on by default? According to the
>> description it's a bit dangerous and it's exposed via sysfs
>> rather than debugfs.
>
>
Should I disable just CONFIG_CORESIGHT_CTI_INTEGRATION_REGS or
CONFIG_CORESIGHT_CTI as well? There are other writable registers exposed
via sysfs outside of these two options, so I wanted to check if it's
just the integration registers that are the issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists