linux-kernel - Syscall kill() can send signal to thread ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <69E17223-F0CA-4A4C-AAD7-065D6E6266D9@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:11:12 +0800
From:   cambda@...ux.alibaba.com
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Cambda Zhu <cambda@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Syscall kill() can send signal to thread ID

I found syscall kill() can send signal to a thread id, which is
not the TGID. But the Linux manual page kill(2) said:

"The kill() system call can be used to send any signal to any
process group or process."

And the Linux manual page tkill(2) said:

"tgkill() sends the signal sig to the thread with the thread ID
tid in the thread group tgid.  (By contrast, kill(2) can be used
to send a signal only to a process (i.e., thread group) as a
whole, and the signal will be delivered to an arbitrary thread
within that process.)"

I don't know whether the meaning of this 'process' should be
the TGID? Because I found kill(tid, 0) will return ESRCH on FreeBSD,
while Linux sends signal to the thread group that the thread belongs
to.

If this is as expected, should we add a notice to the Linux manual
page? Because it's a syscall and the pids not equal to tgid are not
listed under /proc. This may be a little confusing, I guess.

Regards,
Cambda