[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220922012431.232372-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:24:31 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: acme@...nel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, songliubraving@...com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, davemarchevsky@...com, wcohen@...hat.com,
andres@...razel.de, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] perf annotate: use strscpy() is more robust and safer
From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 5bc63c9e0324..e2b038b14ff6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1702,7 +1702,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
char *new_name = filename_with_chroot(dso->nsinfo->pid,
filename);
if (new_name) {
- strlcpy(filename, new_name, filename_size);
+ strscpy(filename, new_name, filename_size);
free(new_name);
}
}
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ static int symbol__disassemble(struct symbol *sym, struct annotate_args *args)
kce.len = sym->end - sym->start;
if (!kcore_extract__create(&kce)) {
delete_extract = true;
- strlcpy(symfs_filename, kce.extract_filename,
+ strscpy(symfs_filename, kce.extract_filename,
sizeof(symfs_filename));
}
} else if (dso__needs_decompress(dso)) {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists