linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/45] 5.15.70-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYs5BDHc2638p7br6-RzQzdJjxOOUvujyssy0bOWKOtLCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:30:51 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com, Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/45] 5.15.70-rc1 review

On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 21:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.70 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:36:33 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.70-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions on arm64 allmodconfig builds failed.

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

* arm64, build failed.
  - clang-12-allmodconfig
  - clang-13-allmodconfig
  - clang-14-allmodconfig
  - clang-nightly-allmodconfig
  - gcc-10-allmodconfig
  - gcc-11-allmodconfig
  - gcc-12-allmodconfig

> Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
>     arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature

Build errors:
---------------
arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c:136:23: error:
'kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig' undeclared here (not in a function); did
you mean 'arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig'?
  136 |         .verify_sig = kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig,
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                       arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig


## Build
* kernel: 5.15.70-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 16d41e601858766935e69e3f9d62db810e5d277d
* git describe: v5.15.69-46-g16d41e601858
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.69-46-g16d41e601858

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.69)
* arm64, build
  - clang-12-allmodconfig
  - clang-13-allmodconfig
  - clang-14-allmodconfig
  - clang-nightly-allmodconfig
  - gcc-10-allmodconfig
  - gcc-11-allmodconfig
  - gcc-12-allmodconfig

## No Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.69)

## No Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.69)

## No Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.69)

## Test result summary
total: 106713, pass: 94034, fail: 687, skip: 11680, xfail: 312

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 339 total, 336 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 72 total, 63 passed, 9 failed
* i386: 61 total, 55 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 62 total, 59 passed, 3 failed
* parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 69 total, 66 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 30 total, 27 passed, 3 failed
* sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 65 total, 63 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org