[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yyw24J7YFVtxsnJ7@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:20:16 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: cgel.zte@...il.com, Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] kunit: tool: use absolute path for wget
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:09:28PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 4:36 PM <cgel.zte@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
> >
> > Not using absolute path when invoking wget can lead to serious
> > security issues.
> >
> > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
> > ---
>
> This seems mostly okay to me -- we'd be abandoning people who have
> wget in an unusual location, but I don't think there are many people
> who want to run KUnit under RISC-V, have wget in a non-standard
> location, and can't acquire the bios file themselves.
>
> So this is:
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Please no, at this point in time, submissions from this gmail "alias"
are going to have to be rejected from the kernel.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists