[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220922013644.233230-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:36:44 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: acme@...nel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] perf intel-pt: use strscpy() is more robust and safer
From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
---
tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
index 0ac860c8dd2b..0194e2003ba7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ int intel_pt__strerror(int code, char *buf, size_t buflen)
{
if (code < 1 || code >= INTEL_PT_ERR_MAX)
code = INTEL_PT_ERR_UNK;
- strlcpy(buf, intel_pt_err_msgs[code], buflen);
+ strscpy(buf, intel_pt_err_msgs[code], buflen);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists