[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <316fc8ae-b96b-1fb6-4a24-b8bcc6f8b948@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 20:22:19 +0800
From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
<liu3101@...due.edu>, <nogikh@...gle.com>, <elver@...gle.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
<dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] kcov: Switch to use list_for_each_entry() helper
On 2022/9/22 20:15, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-09-22 18:50:25 [+0800], Chen Zhongjin wrote:
>> --- a/kernel/kcov.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kcov.c
>> @@ -133,10 +133,8 @@ static struct kcov_remote *kcov_remote_add(struct kcov *kcov, u64 handle)
>> static struct kcov_remote_area *kcov_remote_area_get(unsigned int size)
>> {
>> struct kcov_remote_area *area;
>> - struct list_head *pos;
>>
>> - list_for_each(pos, &kcov_remote_areas) {
>> - area = list_entry(pos, struct kcov_remote_area, list);
>> + list_for_each_entry(pos, &kcov_remote_areas, list) {
> so how does this work if you remove pos?
Oops... will fix that.
Thanks so much!
>> if (area->size == size) {
>> list_del(&area->list);
>> return area;
> Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists