[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABnWg9uZ=FrumgUzyUoUiS6T51nZTEf5JZ-1KF0-Ra9Ood5ufA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 05:45:43 -0700
From: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/17] dt-bindings: clk: mediatek: Add MT8195 DPI clocks
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>On 19/09/2022 18:55, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
>> From: Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>
>>
>> Expand dt-bindings slot for VDOSYS1 of MT8195.
>> This clock is required by the DPI1 hardware
>> and is a downstream of the HDMI pixel clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>
>>
>
>Looks like broken patch.
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
>
Hi Bo-Chen and Krzysztof,
I've sent the patches using the rather new b4 prep/send commands.
Though it produces valid patches, it's using `git show --format=email`
to produce the patches, which lacks a diffstat.
My understanding is that the diffstat is considered to be comments and thus
are not necessary to produce a valid patch.
I've reported the issue on the tools mailing list [1], I'm looking at providing
a fix.
I'll be extra careful at the patch format for V2.
Sorry for the inconveniance,
Guillaume.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/tools/CABnWg9uBOGqJMq=yCtn7SoEME=+2u1-ZK9ftb6=_jRhkhL_jiw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
Powered by blists - more mailing lists