[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d75a9fd-1b94-7208-9de8-5a0102223e68@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:45:19 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] net: ipa: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket
size
On 9/21/22 10:10 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Instead of discovering the kmalloc bucket size _after_ allocation, round
> up proactively so the allocation is explicitly made for the full size,
> allowing the compiler to correctly reason about the resulting size of
> the buffer through the existing __alloc_size() hint.
>
> Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ipa/gsi_trans.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipa/gsi_trans.c b/drivers/net/ipa/gsi_trans.c
> index 18e7e8c405be..cec968854dcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ipa/gsi_trans.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ipa/gsi_trans.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ int gsi_trans_pool_init(struct gsi_trans_pool *pool, size_t size, u32 count,
> u32 max_alloc)
> {
> void *virt;
> + size_t allocate;
I don't care about this but the reverse Christmas tree
convention would put the "allocate" variable definition
above "virt".
Whether you fix that or not, this patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> if (!size)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -104,13 +105,15 @@ int gsi_trans_pool_init(struct gsi_trans_pool *pool, size_t size, u32 count,
> * If there aren't enough entries starting at the free index,
> * we just allocate free entries from the beginning of the pool.
> */
> - virt = kcalloc(count + max_alloc - 1, size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + allocate = size_mul(count + max_alloc - 1, size);
> + allocate = kmalloc_size_roundup(allocate);
> + virt = kzalloc(allocate, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!virt)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> pool->base = virt;
> /* If the allocator gave us any extra memory, use it */
> - pool->count = ksize(pool->base) / size;
> + pool->count = allocate / size;
> pool->free = 0;
> pool->max_alloc = max_alloc;
> pool->size = size;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists