linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195-mt6359: Use snd_soc_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce4a6e7f-dee3-c260-bd42-bc77927916e8@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 16:10:47 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tiwai@...e.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, trevor.wu@...iatek.com,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195-mt6359: Use snd_soc_pm_ops instead
 of custom ops

Il 22/09/22 15:30, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 07:26:21PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> 
>> snd_soc_pm_ops[1] sets some more fields.  I'm not quite sure whether
>> it would introduce any side effect or not.  Perhaps Trevor could
>> provide some suggestions.
> 
> If it does it should be to fix isues rather than introduce new
> problems - I suspect the other operations just don't work
> currently.

 From my upstream tests, this didn't introduce any issues, that's why I've
sent this patch.

In any case, let's check with Trevor, just as to be extremely sure, but please
use an upstream kernel for eventual tests, as there are quite a bit of changes
between 5.10 and current upstream.

Cheers,
Angelo