[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6eaa797-380b-e8ae-f928-54843dd596f2@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:31:20 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
acme@...nel.org, leo.yan@...aro.org, john.garry@...wei.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf: arm64: Kernel support for Dwarf unwinding
through SVE functions
On 22/09/2022 15:04, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:26:56PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>> I'm resubmitting this with a few of the changes suggested by Will on V2.
>>
>> I haven't made any changes regarding the open questions about the
>> discoverability or saving the new reg and passing to output_sample()
>> because I think it's best to be consistent with the implementations on
>> other platforms first. I have explained in more detail on v2 [1].
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5fcf1a6f-c8fb-c296-992e-18aae8874095@arm.com/
>
> Fair enough, I can't argue against being consistent.
>
> Given that this exposes subtle new user ABI, do we have any coverage in
> the selftests? If not, please could you add something?
>
Thanks, I will do that. I assume you mean the self tests in
tools/perf/tests and not some non Perf tests?
> Thanks,
>
> Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists