[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03d87746-8454-c7eb-6698-af2d02abdc42@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:48:59 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Disable interrupt or preemption before
acquiring arch_spinlock_t
On 9/22/22 10:31, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 09:31:58AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> It was found that some tracing functions in kernel/trace/trace.c acquire
>> an arch_spinlock_t with preemption and irqs enabled. An example is the
>> tracing_saved_cmdlines_size_read() function which intermittently causes
>> a "BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible" warning when the LTP
>> read_all_proc test is run.
>>
>> That can be problematic in case preemption happens after acquiring the
>> lock. Add the necessary preemption or interrupt disabling code in the
>> appropriate places before acquiring an arch_spinlock_t.
>>
>> The convention here is to disable preemption for trace_cmdline_lock and
>> interupt for max_lock.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> This seems to be missing a Fixes: tag :-)
Sorry for the omission. The patch should have the following fixes tags.
Fixes: a35873a0993b ("tracing: Add conditional snapshot")
Fixes: 939c7a4f04fc ("tracing: Introduce saved_cmdlines_size file")
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists