[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i0NzJfRuqcuJQC3J5moaEikoRusquCybAz0T8dMy8gCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:53:17 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, andi@...as.de,
Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
ananth.narayan@....com, gautham.shenoy@....com,
Calvin Ong <calvin.ong@....com>,
Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor_idle: Skip dummy wait for processors
based on the Zen microarchitecture
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 5:36 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 05:21:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, it can be forced to use ACPI idle instead.
>
> Yeah, I did that earlier. The dummy IO read in question costs ~3K on
> average on my Coffeelake box here.
Well, that's the cost of forcing something non-default.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists