[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <166395610428.401.17778412481657298654.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:01:44 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for James Morse" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/cache] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() into
resctrl_arch_rmid_read()
The following commit has been merged into the x86/cache branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 1d81d15db39c2b517bc58f63008c6255dd08aafe
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/1d81d15db39c2b517bc58f63008c6255dd08aafe
Author: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 15:48:25
Committer: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CommitterDate: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:22:20 +02:00
x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() into resctrl_arch_rmid_read()
resctrl_arch_rmid_read() is intended as the function that an
architecture agnostic resctrl filesystem driver can use to
read a value in bytes from a counter. Currently the function returns
the MBM values in chunks directly from hardware. When reading a bandwidth
counter, mbm_overflow_count() must be used to correct for any possible
overflow.
mbm_overflow_count() is architecture specific, its behaviour should
be part of resctrl_arch_rmid_read().
Move the mbm_overflow_count() calls into resctrl_arch_rmid_read().
This allows the resctrl filesystems's prev_msr to be removed in
favour of the architecture private version.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Tested-by: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220902154829.30399-18-james.morse@arm.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 35 ++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
index 1d2e7bd..8039e8a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
@@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ struct rftype {
/**
* struct mbm_state - status for each MBM counter in each domain
* @chunks: Total data moved (multiply by rdt_group.mon_scale to get bytes)
- * @prev_msr: Value of IA32_QM_CTR for this RMID last time we read it
* @prev_bw_chunks: Previous chunks value read for bandwidth calculation
* @prev_bw: The most recent bandwidth in MBps
* @delta_bw: Difference between the current and previous bandwidth
@@ -289,7 +288,6 @@ struct rftype {
*/
struct mbm_state {
u64 chunks;
- u64 prev_msr;
u64 prev_bw_chunks;
u32 prev_bw;
u32 delta_bw;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
index 262141b..862a446 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -167,9 +167,20 @@ void resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
memset(am, 0, sizeof(*am));
}
+static u64 mbm_overflow_count(u64 prev_msr, u64 cur_msr, unsigned int width)
+{
+ u64 shift = 64 - width, chunks;
+
+ chunks = (cur_msr << shift) - (prev_msr << shift);
+ return chunks >> shift;
+}
+
int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id eventid, u64 *val)
{
+ struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(r);
+ struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom = resctrl_to_arch_dom(d);
+ struct arch_mbm_state *am;
u64 msr_val;
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &d->cpu_mask))
@@ -191,7 +202,13 @@ int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
if (msr_val & RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL)
return -EINVAL;
- *val = msr_val;
+ am = get_arch_mbm_state(hw_dom, rmid, eventid);
+ if (am) {
+ *val = mbm_overflow_count(am->prev_msr, msr_val, hw_res->mbm_width);
+ am->prev_msr = msr_val;
+ } else {
+ *val = msr_val;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -322,19 +339,10 @@ void free_rmid(u32 rmid)
list_add_tail(&entry->list, &rmid_free_lru);
}
-static u64 mbm_overflow_count(u64 prev_msr, u64 cur_msr, unsigned int width)
-{
- u64 shift = 64 - width, chunks;
-
- chunks = (cur_msr << shift) - (prev_msr << shift);
- return chunks >> shift;
-}
-
static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
{
- struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(rr->r);
struct mbm_state *m;
- u64 chunks, tval = 0;
+ u64 tval = 0;
if (rr->first)
resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(rr->r, rr->d, rmid, rr->evtid);
@@ -363,13 +371,10 @@ static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
if (rr->first) {
memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
- m->prev_msr = tval;
return 0;
}
- chunks = mbm_overflow_count(m->prev_msr, tval, hw_res->mbm_width);
- m->chunks += chunks;
- m->prev_msr = tval;
+ m->chunks += tval;
rr->val += get_corrected_mbm_count(rmid, m->chunks);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists