linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] media: platform: Add Renesas RZ/G2L CRU driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yy4TtzPtSN9qiiQS@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 20:14:47 +0000
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
        Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] media: platform: Add Renesas RZ/G2L CRU driver

Hi Prabhakar,

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:04:06AM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
...

> +#define to_buf_list(vb2_buffer) (&container_of(vb2_buffer, \
> +						struct rzg2l_cru_buffer, \
> +						vb)->list)

#define to_buf_list(vb2_buffer) \
	(&container_of(vb2_buffer, struct rzg2l_cru_buffer, vb)->list)


...

> +static int rzg2l_cru_open(struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru = video_drvdata(file);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(cru->pclk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(cru->vclk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto disable_pclk;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(cru->aclk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto disable_vclk;
> +
> +	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&cru->lock);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto disable_aclk;
> +
> +	file->private_data = cru;
> +	ret = v4l2_fh_open(file);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_unlock;
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_pipeline_pm_get(&cru->vdev.entity);

Please use runtime PM instead in sensor drivers, we're trying to get rid of
this function.

It'd be nice to have it in this one as well.

> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto err_open;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&cru->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +err_open:
> +	v4l2_fh_release(file);
> +err_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&cru->lock);
> +disable_aclk:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(cru->aclk);
> +disable_vclk:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(cru->vclk);
> +disable_pclk:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(cru->pclk);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

...

> +void rzg2l_cru_v4l2_unregister(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
> +{
> +	if (!video_is_registered(&cru->vdev))
> +		return;
> +
> +	v4l2_info(&cru->v4l2_dev, "Removed %s\n",
> +		  video_device_node_name(&cru->vdev));

I'd just leave this out. Same for the similar message on registration.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus