[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yy48GPMdQS/pzNSa@ziepe.ca>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 20:07:04 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Minturn Dave B <dave.b.minturn@...el.com>,
Jason Ekstrand <jason@...kstrand.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Xiong Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@...il.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/8] mm: introduce FOLL_PCI_P2PDMA to gate getting
PCI P2PDMA pages
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 05:01:26PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2022-09-23 16:58, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 02:11:03PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2022-09-23 13:53, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 01:08:31PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> I'm encouraging Dan to work on better infrastructure in pgmap core
> >>> because every pgmap implementation has this issue currently.
> >>>
> >>> For that reason it is probably not so relavent to this series.
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps just clarify in the commit message that the FOLL_LONGTERM
> >>> restriction is to copy DAX until the pgmap page refcounts are fixed.
> >>
> >> Ok, I'll add that note.
> >>
> >> Per the fix for the try_grab_page(), to me it doesn't fit well in
> >> try_grab_page() without doing a bunch of cleanup to change the
> >> error handling, and the same would have to be added to try_grab_folio().
> >> So I think it's better to leave it where it was, but move it below the
> >> respective grab calls. Does the incremental patch below look correct?
> >
> > Oh? I was thinking of just a very simple thing:
>
> Really would like it to return -EREMOTEIO instead of -ENOMEM as that's the
> error used for bad P2PDMA page everywhere.
I'd rather not see GUP made more fragile just for that..
> Plus the concern that some of the callsites of try_grab_page() might not have
> a get or a pin and thus it's not safe which was the whole point of the change
> anyway.
try_grab_page() calls folio_ref_inc(), that is only legal if it knows
the page is already a valid pointer under the PTLs, so it is safe to
check the pgmap as well.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists