[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yy2DniTKbL0hxWeO@kadam>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:59:58 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+1631f09646bc214d2e76@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: fix negative shift size in
true_sectors_per_clst()
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 05:47:51PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 17:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > it appears that the NTFS3 maintainer is MIA again. :(
>
> (I've no affiliation with the NTFS3 maintainer or paragon)
>
> Perhaps the expectation of prioritized immediate turnaround is unrealistic.
>
> It's free. Be patient.
It's not just Randy. There are a bunch of fixes which are waiting to be
merged...
I sometimes look at syzkaller patches but it's like with ntfs3 why even
bother because the maintainer is gone? It's not going in anyway.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists