[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yy2FPMoyQS+U6AWX@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:06:52 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-mpc52xx: switch to using gpiod API
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 09:51:37PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This switches the driver to use gpiod API instead of legacy gpio API,
> which will brings us close to removing of_get_gpio() and other
> OF-specific old APIs.
>
> No functional change intended beyond some differences in error messages.
Fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks!
One nit-pick below.
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> index 97cdd6545ee1..cb075c1acbee 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -18,7 +19,6 @@
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct mpc52xx_spi {
> const u8 *tx_buf;
> int cs_change;
> int gpio_cs_count;
> - unsigned int *gpio_cs;
> + struct gpio_desc **gpio_cs;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -102,9 +102,10 @@ static void mpc52xx_spi_chipsel(struct mpc52xx_spi *ms, int value)
>
> if (ms->gpio_cs_count > 0) {
> cs = ms->message->spi->chip_select;
> - gpio_set_value(ms->gpio_cs[cs], value ? 0 : 1);
> - } else
> + gpiod_set_value(ms->gpio_cs[cs], value);
> + } else {
> out_8(ms->regs + SPI_PORTDATA, value ? 0 : 0x08);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -386,10 +387,10 @@ static int mpc52xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> {
> struct spi_master *master;
> struct mpc52xx_spi *ms;
> + struct gpio_desc *gpio_cs;
> void __iomem *regs;
> u8 ctrl1;
> int rc, i = 0;
> - int gpio_cs;
>
> /* MMIO registers */
> dev_dbg(&op->dev, "probing mpc5200 SPI device\n");
> @@ -451,23 +452,16 @@ static int mpc52xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < ms->gpio_cs_count; i++) {
> - gpio_cs = of_get_gpio(op->dev.of_node, i);
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio_cs)) {
> - dev_err(&op->dev,
> - "could not parse the gpio field in oftree\n");
> - rc = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_gpio;
> - }
> -
> - rc = gpio_request(gpio_cs, dev_name(&op->dev));
> + gpio_cs = gpiod_get_index(&op->dev,
> + NULL, i, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
More parameters can be placed on the previous line, but I think you can even
put everything on one line (it's only 85 characters long).
> + rc = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(gpio_cs);
> if (rc) {
> dev_err(&op->dev,
> - "can't request spi cs gpio #%d on gpio line %d\n",
> - i, gpio_cs);
> + "failed to get spi cs gpio #%d: %d\n",
> + i, rc);
> goto err_gpio;
> }
>
> - gpio_direction_output(gpio_cs, 1);
> ms->gpio_cs[i] = gpio_cs;
> }
> }
> @@ -508,7 +502,7 @@ static int mpc52xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> dev_err(&ms->master->dev, "initialization failed\n");
> err_gpio:
> while (i-- > 0)
> - gpio_free(ms->gpio_cs[i]);
> + gpiod_put(ms->gpio_cs[i]);
>
> kfree(ms->gpio_cs);
> err_alloc_gpio:
> @@ -529,7 +523,7 @@ static int mpc52xx_spi_remove(struct platform_device *op)
> free_irq(ms->irq1, ms);
>
> for (i = 0; i < ms->gpio_cs_count; i++)
> - gpio_free(ms->gpio_cs[i]);
> + gpiod_put(ms->gpio_cs[i]);
>
> kfree(ms->gpio_cs);
> spi_unregister_master(master);
> --
> 2.37.3.998.g577e59143f-goog
>
>
> --
> Dmitry
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists