lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2166557.taCxCBeP46@phil>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:22:34 +0200
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     kever.yang@...k-chips.com, sjg@...omium.org,
        philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        kishon@...com, vkoul@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        zhangqing@...k-chips.com, jamie@...ieiles.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3128-pwm

Am Dienstag, 20. September 2022, 08:21:49 CEST schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:02:22AM +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> > Add rockchip,rk3128-pwm compatible string.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> 
> Is the expectation that this goes in via PWM, or together with the other
> patches via the rockchip maintainers?

in general I think bindings always go through the subsystem that
they're targetting - PWM in this case.

Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>


Heiko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ