[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f2e16b5-7fec-3d54-21ef-dd42acfab553@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:34:59 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, german.gomez@....com, leo.yan@...aro.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, john.garry@...wei.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] perf: arm64: Tools support for Dwarf unwinding
through SVE functions
On 26/05/2022 16:23, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:41:09PM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
>> Changes since v2:
>> * Add commit to fix header include path to use Perf's copy
>> * Apply Leo's review tags
>>
>> When SVE registers are pushed onto the stack the VG register is required to
>> unwind because the stack offsets would vary by the SVE register width at the
>> time when the sample was taken.
>>
>> The patches ("[PATCH v2 0/2] perf: arm64: Kernel support for Dwarf unwinding
>> through SVE functions") add support for sampling the VG register to the kernel
>> and the docs. This is the patchset to add support to userspace perf.
>>
>> A small change is also required to libunwind or libdw depending on which
>> unwinder is used, and these will be published later. Without these changes Perf
>> continues to work with both libraries, although the VG register is still not
>> used for unwinding.
>
> Thanks, applied.
>
> - Arnaldo
Hi Arnaldo,
Will has applied the kernel side here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next/perf&id=cbb0c02caf4bd98b9e0cd6d7420734b8e9a35703
There was a small change in the formatting in perf_regs.h, but the
values are all the same. So in theory it's fine to leave Perf's copy
until the next update, although it is a bit weird.
Thanks
James
>
>
>> Thanks
>> James
>>
>> James Clark (5):
>> perf tools: arm64: Use perf's copy of kernel headers
>> perf tools: arm64: Copy perf_regs.h from the kernel
>> perf tools: Use dynamic register set for Dwarf unwind
>> perf tools: arm64: Decouple Libunwind register names from Perf
>> perf tools: arm64: Add support for VG register
>>
>> tools/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 7 +-
>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c | 34 +++++++++
>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/unwind-libunwind.c | 73 +------------------
>> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 2 +-
>> tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c | 2 +-
>> tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 2 +
>> 6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.28.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists