[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220923123529.GB13942@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:35:30 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, guoren@...nel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, mhiramat@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mark.rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org, alexandru.elisei@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64/kprobe: Optimize the performance of patching
single-step slot
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 04:46:58PM +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
> Single-step slot would not be used until kprobe is enabled, that means
> no race condition occurs on it under SMP, hence it is safe to pacth ss
> slot without stopping machine.
>
> Since I and D caches are coherent within single-step slot from
> aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(), hence no need to do it again via
> flush_icache_range().
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index d1d182320245..29b98bc12833 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -44,13 +44,10 @@ post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe *, struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *);
> static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> kprobe_opcode_t *addr = p->ainsn.api.insn;
> - void *addrs[] = {addr, addr + 1};
> - u32 insns[] = {p->opcode, BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES_SS};
>
> /* prepare insn slot */
> - aarch64_insn_patch_text(addrs, insns, 2);
> -
> - flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)addr, (uintptr_t)(addr + MAX_INSN_SIZE));
> + aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(addr, p->opcode);
> + aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(addr + 1, BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES_SS);
>
> /*
> * Needs restoring of return address after stepping xol.
> --
> 2.17.1
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists