lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220923123633.GC13942@willie-the-truck>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:36:35 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        acme@...nel.org, john.garry@...wei.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, leo.yan@...aro.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf: arm64: Kernel support for Dwarf unwinding
 through SVE functions

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:32:15AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22/09/2022 21:33, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:26:56 +0100, James Clark wrote:
> >> I'm resubmitting this with a few of the changes suggested by Will on V2.
> >>
> >> I haven't made any changes regarding the open questions about the
> >> discoverability or saving the new reg and passing to output_sample()
> >> because I think it's best to be consistent with the implementations on
> >> other platforms first. I have explained in more detail on v2 [1].
> >>
> >> [...]
> > 
> > Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!
> > 
> > [1/2] perf: arm64: Add SVE vector granule register to user regs
> >       https://git.kernel.org/will/c/cbb0c02caf4b
> > [2/2] arm64/sve: Add Perf extensions documentation
> >       https://git.kernel.org/will/c/1f2906d1e10a
> > 
> > Cheers,
> 
> Thanks Will. Sorry about the build, I will fix my config for next time.

No problem. For some reason, I was unable to repro the failure locally.
Maybe it's a GCC thing?

Will

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ