[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220923133512.GE22541@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:35:12 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, urezki@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Zaharinov <micron10@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm] mm: fix BUG with kvzalloc+GFP_ATOMIC
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
> On Fri 23-09-22 12:38:58, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Martin Zaharinov reports BUG() in mm land for 5.19.10 kernel:
> > kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2437!
> > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > CPU: 28 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/28 Tainted: G W O 5.19.9 #1
> > [..]
> > RIP: 0010:__get_vm_area_node+0x120/0x130
> > __vmalloc_node_range+0x96/0x1e0
> > kvmalloc_node+0x92/0xb0
> > bucket_table_alloc.isra.0+0x47/0x140
> > rhashtable_try_insert+0x3a4/0x440
> > rhashtable_insert_slow+0x1b/0x30
> > [..]
> >
> > bucket_table_alloc uses kvzallocGPF_ATOMIC). If kmalloc fails, this now
> > falls through to vmalloc and hits code paths that assume GFP_KERNEL.
> >
> > Revert the problematic change and stay with slab allocator.
>
> Why don't you simply fix the caller?
Uh, not following?
kvzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) was perfectly fine, is this illegal again?
I can revert 93f976b5190df32793908d49165f78e67fcb66cf instead
but that change is from 2018.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists