linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH V5 3/7] ublk_drv: requeue rqs with recovery feature enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yy244pPF+iQrorE3@T590>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 21:47:14 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V5 3/7] ublk_drv: requeue rqs with recovery
 feature enabled

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 02:15:01PM +0800, ZiyangZhang wrote:
> With recovery feature enabled, in ublk_queue_rq or task work
> (in exit_task_work or fallback wq), we requeue rqs instead of
> ending(aborting) them. Besides, No matter recovery feature is enabled
> or disabled, we schedule monitor_work immediately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 05bfbaa49696..3ae13e46ece6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -655,6 +655,16 @@ static void ubq_complete_io_cmd(struct ublk_io *io, int res)
>  
>  #define UBLK_REQUEUE_DELAY_MS	3
>  
> +static inline void __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> +		struct request *rq)
> +{
> +	/* We cannot process this rq so just requeue it. */
> +	if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq))
> +		blk_mq_requeue_request(rq, false);
> +	else
> +		blk_mq_end_request(rq, BLK_STS_IOERR);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void __ublk_rq_task_work(struct request *req)
>  {
>  	struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
> @@ -677,7 +687,7 @@ static inline void __ublk_rq_task_work(struct request *req)
>  	 * (2) current->flags & PF_EXITING.
>  	 */
>  	if (unlikely(current != ubq->ubq_daemon || current->flags & PF_EXITING)) {
> -		blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR);
> +		__ublk_abort_rq(ubq, req);
>  		mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &ub->monitor_work, 0);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -769,7 +779,8 @@ static blk_status_t ublk_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  	if (unlikely(ubq_daemon_is_dying(ubq))) {
>   fail:
>  		mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &ubq->dev->monitor_work, 0);
> -		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +		__ublk_abort_rq(ubq, rq);

mod_delayed_work() can be put into __ublk_abort_rq() too, otherwise
looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>


thanks,
Ming