linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] fpga: dfl: add generic support for MSIX interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yy3O5OeDjJ99g/M2@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:21:08 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     hao.wu@...el.com, yilun.xu@...el.com, russell.h.weight@...el.com,
        basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...el.com, trix@...hat.com,
        mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tianfei.zhang@...el.com, corbet@....net,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        jirislaby@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
        niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, phil.edworthy@...esas.com,
        macro@...am.me.uk, johan@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] fpga: dfl: add generic support for MSIX interrupts

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 05:17:43AM -0700, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Define and use a DFHv1 parameter to add generic support for MSIX
> interrupts for DFL devices.

...

> +	if (fid != FEATURE_ID_AFU && fid != PORT_FEATURE_ID_ERROR &&
> +	    fid != PORT_FEATURE_ID_UINT && fid != FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_ERR) {

> +

Unneeded blank line.

> +		v = FIELD_GET(DFH_VERSION, readq(base));
> +		switch (v) {

This v...

> +		case 0:
> +			break;
> +
> +		case 1:
> +			v =  readq(base + DFHv1_CSR_SIZE_GRP);

Extra space.

...and this v are semantically different. It's quite hard to deduce their
semantics.

> +			if (FIELD_GET(DFHv1_CSR_SIZE_GRP_HAS_PARAMS, v)) {
> +				off = dfl_find_param(base + DFHv1_PARAM_HDR, ofst,
> +						     DFHv1_PARAM_ID_MSIX);

I guess I have suggested to use temporary variable(s) here.

			void __iomem *dfhv1 = base + DFHv1...;
			void __iomem *nth;

> +				if (off >= 0) {

					nth = dfhv1 + off;

> +					ibase = readl(base + DFHv1_PARAM_HDR +
> +						      off + DFHv1_PARAM_MSIX_STARTV);
> +					inr = readl(base + DFHv1_PARAM_HDR +
> +						    off + DFHv1_PARAM_MSIX_NUMV);

					ibase = readl(nth + DFHv1_PARAM_MSIX_STARTV);
					inr = readl(nth + DFHv1_PARAM_MSIX_NUMV);

> +					dev_dbg(binfo->dev, "start %d num %d fid 0x%x\n",
> +						ibase, inr, fid);
> +				}
> +			}
> +			break;
> +
> +		default:
> +			dev_warn(binfo->dev, "unexpected DFH version %lld\n", v);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko