linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Userspace P2PDMA with O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47004362-15ec-5356-6c1e-ba69b1910cef@deltatee.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 09:25:51 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Minturn Dave B <dave.b.minturn@...el.com>,
        Jason Ekstrand <jason@...kstrand.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Xiong Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@...il.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Userspace P2PDMA with O_DIRECT NVMe devices




On 2022-09-23 00:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Thanks, the entire series looks good to me now:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> 
> Given that this is spread all over, what tree do we want to take it
> through?

Yes, while this is ostensibly a feature for NVMe it turns out we didn't
need to touch any NVMe code at all.

The most likely patch in my mind to have conflicts is the iov_iter patch
as there's been a lot of churn there in the last few cycles and there
are continued discussions.

There are 2 PCI patches, but Bjorn's aware of them and has acked them.
I'm also fairly confident this shouldn't conflict with anything in his tree.

Besides that, there is one mm/gup patch which is the next likely to
conflict; one scatterlist patch and three block layer patches which have
largely been stable when I've done rebases.

Logan