lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez2NQKVbv=yG_fq_jtZjf8Q=+Wy54FxcFrK_OujFg5BwSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:38:12 +0200
From:   Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, jean-philippe.brucker@....com
Cc:     Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: some likely bugs in IOMMUv2 (in tlb_finish_mmu() nested flush and mremap())

Hi!

I looked through some of the code related to IOMMUv2 (the thing where
the IOMMU walks the normal userspace page tables and TLB shootdowns
are replicated to the IOMMU through
mmu_notifier_ops::invalidate_range).

I think there's a bug in the interaction between tlb_finish_mmu() and
mmu_notifier_ops::invalidate_range: In the mm_tlb_flush_nested() case,
__tlb_reset_range() sets tlb->start and tlb->end *both* to ~0.
Afterwards, tlb_finish_mmu() calls
tlb_flush_mmu()->tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly()->mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(),
which will pass those tlb->start and tlb->end values to
mmu_notifier_ops::invalidate_range callbacks. But those callbacks
don't know about this special case and then basically only flush
virtual address ~0, making the flush useless. (However, pretty much
every place that calls tlb_finish_mmu() first calls
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() even though the appropriate thing
would probably be mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_only_end(); and I
think those two things probably cancel each other out?)

Also, from what I can tell, the mremap() code, in move_page_tables(),
only invokes mmu_notifier_ops::invalidate_range via the
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() at the very end, long after TLB
flushes must have happened - sort of like the bug we had years ago
where mremap() was flushing the normal TLBs too late
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1695).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ