[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220924035226.3359297-1-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 20:52:26 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dlm: Split memcpy() of struct dlm_message flexible array
To work around a misbehavior of the compiler's ability to see into
composite flexible array structs (as detailed in the coming memcpy()
hardening series[1]), split the memcpy() of the header and the payload
so no false positive run-time overflow warning will be generated.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/20220901065914.1417829-2-keescook@chromium.org/
Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
Cc: cluster-devel@...hat.com
Reported-by: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
fs/dlm/requestqueue.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/requestqueue.c b/fs/dlm/requestqueue.c
index 036a9a0078f6..63f45c3c53a2 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/requestqueue.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/requestqueue.c
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ void dlm_add_requestqueue(struct dlm_ls *ls, int nodeid, struct dlm_message *ms)
e->recover_seq = ls->ls_recover_seq & 0xFFFFFFFF;
e->nodeid = nodeid;
- memcpy(&e->request, ms, le16_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_length));
+ e->request = *ms;
+ memcpy(&e->request.m_extra, ms->m_extra, length);
atomic_inc(&ls->ls_requestqueue_cnt);
mutex_lock(&ls->ls_requestqueue_mutex);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists