[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yy7Ll1QJ+u+nkic9@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 11:19:19 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"open list:S390" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:KEXEC" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to
verify kernel image signature + dependencies
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is backport of commit 0d519cadf751
> ("arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature")
> to table 5.15 tree including the preparatory patches.
This feels to me like a new feature for arm64, one that has never worked
before and you are just making it feature-parity with x86, right?
Or is this a regression fix somewhere? Why is this needed in 5.15.y and
why can't people who need this new feature just use a newer kernel
version (5.19?)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists