linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pwm: lpss: Use DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS() and pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220924100714.mn6o5iggv5dtucyd@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2022 12:07:14 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pwm: lpss: Use DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS() and
 pm_ptr() macros

On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:56:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Using these new macros allows the compiler to remove the unused dev_pm_ops
> structure and related functions if !CONFIG_PM without the need to mark
> the functions __maybe_unused.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

that was one of the patches I thought I already acked. I didn't check if
I'm confused or if you missed to add my Ack. Doesn't really matter to
me. So:

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)