[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91a4759f-88e4-f9ac-aff5-41d2db5ecfdd@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 19:43:16 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm,hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove
memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage
On 2022/9/21 17:13, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
>
> HWPoisoned page is not supposed to be accessed once marked, but currently
> such accesses can happen during memory hotremove because do_migrate_range()
> can be called before dissolve_free_huge_pages() is called.
>
> Clear HPageMigratable for hwpoisoned hugepages to prevent them from being
> migrated. This should be done in hugetlb_lock to avoid race against
> isolate_hugetlb().
>
> get_hwpoison_huge_page() needs to have a flag to show it's called from
> unpoison to take refcount of hwpoisoned hugepages, so add it.
>
> Reported-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
Thanks for your work, Naoya. Maybe something to improve below.
> ---
> ChangeLog v2 -> v3
> - move to the approach of clearing HPageMigratable instead of shifting
> dissolve_free_huge_pages.
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 4 ++--
> mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
> mm/memory-failure.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> @@ -7267,7 +7267,7 @@ int get_hwpoison_huge_page(struct page *page, bool *hugetlb)
> *hugetlb = true;
> if (HPageFreed(page))
> ret = 0;
> - else if (HPageMigratable(page))
> + else if (HPageMigratable(page) || unpoison)
Is unpoison_memory() expected to restore the HPageMigratable flag as well ?
> ret = get_page_unless_zero(page);
> else
> ret = -EBUSY;
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 145bb561ddb3..5942e1c0407e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page, unsigned long flags)
> int ret = 0;
> bool hugetlb = false;
>
> - ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb);
> + ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb, false);
> if (hugetlb)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ static int __get_unpoison_page(struct page *page)
> int ret = 0;
> bool hugetlb = false;
>
> - ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb);
> + ret = get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb, true);
> if (hugetlb)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1815,6 +1815,13 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Clearing HPageMigratable for hwpoisoned hugepages to prevent them
> + * from being migrated by memory hotremove.
> + */
> + if (count_increased)
> + ClearHPageMigratable(head);
I believe this can prevent hwpoisoned hugepages from being migrated though there still be some windows.
> +
> return ret;
> out:
> if (count_increased)
> @@ -1862,6 +1869,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
>
> if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> hugetlb_clear_page_hwpoison(head);
> + SetHPageMigratable(head);
Would we set HPageMigratable flag for free hugetlb pages here? IIUC, they're not expected to have this flag set.
Thanks,
Miaohe Lin
> unlock_page(head);
> if (res == 1)
> put_page(head);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists