[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7ciURCEeJGPDRtSN9U1JD7dtYWB_Mthf4m=Svw314ZtSvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 09:50:04 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf test: Add kernel lock contention test
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 1:10 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 24/09/22 03:42, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Add a new shell test to check if both normal perf lock record +
> > contention and BPF (with -b) option are working. Use perf bench
> > sched messaging as a workload since it'd create some contention for
> > sending and receiving messages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>
> There are a few things below that don't need to be fixed but
> are perhaps things to be aware of.
>
> Nevertheless:
>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Thanks Adrian, I'll install and run shellcheck next time.
Arnaldo, please let me know if you want me to resend it
with the suggested changes.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists