lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2022 14:11:32 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rushikesh.s.kadam@...el.com, urezki@...il.com,
        neeraj.iitr10@...il.com, frederic@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 12:20:00PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Let’s see whether my iPhone can handle replies ;-)

Now let's see if it can handle replies to replies!  Are you using a
keyboard, or small-screen finger gestures?

> More below:
> 
> > On Sep 23, 2022, at 5:44 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:01:01PM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> >> Implement timer-based RCU lazy callback batching. The batch is flushed
> >> whenever a certain amount of time has passed, or the batch on a
> >> particular CPU grows too big. Also memory pressure will flush it in a
> >> future patch.
> >> 
> >> To handle several corner cases automagically (such as rcu_barrier() and
> >> hotplug), we re-use bypass lists to handle lazy CBs. The bypass list
> >> length has the lazy CB length included in it. A separate lazy CB length
> >> counter is also introduced to keep track of the number of lazy CBs.
> >> 
> >> v5->v6:
> >> 
> >> [ Frederic Weisbec: Program the lazy timer only if WAKE_NOT, since other
> >>  deferral levels wake much earlier so for those it is not needed. ]
> >> 
> >> [ Frederic Weisbec: Use flush flags to keep bypass API code clean. ]
> >> 
> >> [ Frederic Weisbec: Make rcu_barrier() wake up only if main list empty. ]
> >> 
> >> [ Frederic Weisbec: Remove extra 'else if' branch in rcu_nocb_try_bypass(). ]
> >> 
> >> [ Joel: Fix issue where I was not resetting lazy_len after moving it to rdp ]
> >> 
> >> [ Paul/Thomas/Joel: Make call_rcu() default lazy so users don't mess up. ]
> >> 
> >> Suggested-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> > 
> > I am going to put these on a local branch for testing, but a few comments
> > and questions interspersed below.
> > 
> >                            Thanx, Paul
> 
> Ok I replied below, thank you!
> 
> >> include/linux/rcupdate.h |   7 ++
> >> kernel/rcu/Kconfig       |   8 ++
> >> kernel/rcu/rcu.h         |   8 ++
> >> kernel/rcu/tiny.c        |   2 +-
> >> kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 133 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> >> kernel/rcu/tree.h        |  17 +++-
> >> kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h    |   2 +-
> >> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h   | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> 8 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> >> index 08605ce7379d..40ae36904825 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> >> @@ -108,6 +108,13 @@ static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
> >> 
> >> #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> >> 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> >> +void call_rcu_flush(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline void call_rcu_flush(struct rcu_head *head,
> >> +        rcu_callback_t func) {  call_rcu(head, func); }
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> /* Internal to kernel */
> >> void rcu_init(void);
> >> extern int rcu_scheduler_active;
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> >> index f53ad63b2bc6..edd632e68497 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> >> @@ -314,4 +314,12 @@ config TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB
> >>      Say N here if you hate read-side memory barriers.
> >>      Take the default if you are unsure.
> >> 
> >> +config RCU_LAZY
> >> +    bool "RCU callback lazy invocation functionality"
> >> +    depends on RCU_NOCB_CPU
> >> +    default n
> >> +    help
> >> +      To save power, batch RCU callbacks and flush after delay, memory
> >> +      pressure or callback list growing too big.
> >> +
> >> endmenu # "RCU Subsystem"
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> >> index be5979da07f5..65704cbc9df7 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> >> @@ -474,6 +474,14 @@ enum rcutorture_type {
> >>    INVALID_RCU_FLAVOR
> >> };
> >> 
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY)
> >> +unsigned long rcu_lazy_get_jiffies_till_flush(void);
> >> +void rcu_lazy_set_jiffies_till_flush(unsigned long j);
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline unsigned long rcu_lazy_get_jiffies_till_flush(void) { return 0; }
> >> +static inline void rcu_lazy_set_jiffies_till_flush(unsigned long j) { }
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> #if defined(CONFIG_TREE_RCU)
> >> void rcutorture_get_gp_data(enum rcutorture_type test_type, int *flags,
> >>                unsigned long *gp_seq);
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> >> index a33a8d4942c3..810479cf17ba 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> >> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk = {
> >> 
> >> void rcu_barrier(void)
> >> {
> >> -    wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
> >> +    wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_flush);
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_barrier);
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> >> index 5ec97e3f7468..736d0d724207 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> >> @@ -2728,47 +2728,8 @@ static void check_cb_ovld(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> >>    raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp);
> >> }
> >> 
> >> -/**
> >> - * call_rcu() - Queue an RCU callback for invocation after a grace period.
> >> - * @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
> >> - * @func: actual callback function to be invoked after the grace period
> >> - *
> >> - * The callback function will be invoked some time after a full grace
> >> - * period elapses, in other words after all pre-existing RCU read-side
> >> - * critical sections have completed.  However, the callback function
> >> - * might well execute concurrently with RCU read-side critical sections
> >> - * that started after call_rcu() was invoked.
> >> - *
> >> - * RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock()
> >> - * and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested.  In addition, but only in
> >> - * v5.0 and later, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption,
> >> - * or softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
> >> - * sections.  This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq handlers,
> >> - * and NMI handlers.
> >> - *
> >> - * Note that all CPUs must agree that the grace period extended beyond
> >> - * all pre-existing RCU read-side critical section.  On systems with more
> >> - * than one CPU, this means that when "func()" is invoked, each CPU is
> >> - * guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier since the end of its
> >> - * last RCU read-side critical section whose beginning preceded the call
> >> - * to call_rcu().  It also means that each CPU executing an RCU read-side
> >> - * critical section that continues beyond the start of "func()" must have
> >> - * executed a memory barrier after the call_rcu() but before the beginning
> >> - * of that RCU read-side critical section.  Note that these guarantees
> >> - * include CPUs that are offline, idle, or executing in user mode, as
> >> - * well as CPUs that are executing in the kernel.
> >> - *
> >> - * Furthermore, if CPU A invoked call_rcu() and CPU B invoked the
> >> - * resulting RCU callback function "func()", then both CPU A and CPU B are
> >> - * guaranteed to execute a full memory barrier during the time interval
> >> - * between the call to call_rcu() and the invocation of "func()" -- even
> >> - * if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but again only if the system has
> >> - * more than one CPU).
> >> - *
> >> - * Implementation of these memory-ordering guarantees is described here:
> >> - * Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst.
> >> - */
> >> -void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> >> +static void
> >> +__call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy)
> >> {
> >>    static atomic_t doublefrees;
> >>    unsigned long flags;
> >> @@ -2809,7 +2770,7 @@ void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> >>    }
> >> 
> >>    check_cb_ovld(rdp);
> >> -    if (rcu_nocb_try_bypass(rdp, head, &was_alldone, flags))
> >> +    if (rcu_nocb_try_bypass(rdp, head, &was_alldone, flags, lazy))
> >>        return; // Enqueued onto ->nocb_bypass, so just leave.
> >>    // If no-CBs CPU gets here, rcu_nocb_try_bypass() acquired ->nocb_lock.
> >>    rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&rdp->cblist, head);
> >> @@ -2831,8 +2792,84 @@ void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> >>        local_irq_restore(flags);
> >>    }
> >> }
> >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
> >> 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> >> +/**
> >> + * call_rcu_flush() - Queue RCU callback for invocation after grace period, and
> >> + * flush all lazy callbacks (including the new one) to the main ->cblist while
> >> + * doing so.
> >> + *
> >> + * @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
> >> + * @func: actual callback function to be invoked after the grace period
> >> + *
> >> + * The callback function will be invoked some time after a full grace
> >> + * period elapses, in other words after all pre-existing RCU read-side
> >> + * critical sections have completed.
> >> + *
> >> + * Use this API instead of call_rcu() if you don't mind the callback being
> >> + * invoked after very long periods of time on systems without memory pressure
> >> + * and on systems which are lightly loaded or mostly idle.
> > 
> > This comment is backwards, right?  Shouldn't it say something like "Use
> > this API instead of call_rcu() if you don't mind burning extra power..."?
> 
> Yes sorry my mistake :-(. It’s a stale comment from the rework and I’ll update it.

Very good, thank you!

> >> + *
> >> + * Other than the extra delay in callbacks being invoked, this function is
> >> + * identical to, and reuses call_rcu()'s logic. Refer to call_rcu() for more
> >> + * details about memory ordering and other functionality.
> >> + */
> >> +void call_rcu_flush(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> >> +{
> >> +    return __call_rcu_common(head, func, false);
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_flush);
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * call_rcu() - Queue an RCU callback for invocation after a grace period.
> >> + * By default the callbacks are 'lazy' and are kept hidden from the main
> >> + * ->cblist to prevent starting of grace periods too soon.
> >> + * If you desire grace periods to start very soon, use call_rcu_flush().
> >> + *
> >> + * @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
> >> + * @func: actual callback function to be invoked after the grace period
> >> + *
> >> + * The callback function will be invoked some time after a full grace
> >> + * period elapses, in other words after all pre-existing RCU read-side
> >> + * critical sections have completed.  However, the callback function
> >> + * might well execute concurrently with RCU read-side critical sections
> >> + * that started after call_rcu() was invoked.
> >> + *
> >> + * RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock()
> >> + * and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested.  In addition, but only in
> >> + * v5.0 and later, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption,
> >> + * or softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
> >> + * sections.  This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq handlers,
> >> + * and NMI handlers.
> >> + *
> >> + * Note that all CPUs must agree that the grace period extended beyond
> >> + * all pre-existing RCU read-side critical section.  On systems with more
> >> + * than one CPU, this means that when "func()" is invoked, each CPU is
> >> + * guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier since the end of its
> >> + * last RCU read-side critical section whose beginning preceded the call
> >> + * to call_rcu().  It also means that each CPU executing an RCU read-side
> >> + * critical section that continues beyond the start of "func()" must have
> >> + * executed a memory barrier after the call_rcu() but before the beginning
> >> + * of that RCU read-side critical section.  Note that these guarantees
> >> + * include CPUs that are offline, idle, or executing in user mode, as
> >> + * well as CPUs that are executing in the kernel.
> >> + *
> >> + * Furthermore, if CPU A invoked call_rcu() and CPU B invoked the
> >> + * resulting RCU callback function "func()", then both CPU A and CPU B are
> >> + * guaranteed to execute a full memory barrier during the time interval
> >> + * between the call to call_rcu() and the invocation of "func()" -- even
> >> + * if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but again only if the system has
> >> + * more than one CPU).
> >> + *
> >> + * Implementation of these memory-ordering guarantees is described here:
> >> + * Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst.
> >> + */
> >> +void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> >> +{
> >> +    return __call_rcu_common(head, func, true);
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
> >> 
> >> /* Maximum number of jiffies to wait before draining a batch. */
> >> #define KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES (5 * HZ)
> >> @@ -3507,7 +3544,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
> >>        if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
> >>            synchronize_rcu_expedited();
> >>        else
> >> -            wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
> >> +            wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_flush);
> >>        return;
> >>    }
> >> 
> >> @@ -3902,7 +3939,11 @@ static void rcu_barrier_entrain(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> >>    rdp->barrier_head.func = rcu_barrier_callback;
> >>    debug_rcu_head_queue(&rdp->barrier_head);
> >>    rcu_nocb_lock(rdp);
> >> -    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, jiffies));
> >> +    /*
> >> +     * Flush the bypass list, but also wake up the GP thread as otherwise
> >> +     * bypass/lazy CBs maynot be noticed, and can cause real long delays!
> >> +     */
> >> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, jiffies, FLUSH_BP_WAKE));
> >>    if (rcu_segcblist_entrain(&rdp->cblist, &rdp->barrier_head)) {
> >>        atomic_inc(&rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count);
> >>    } else {
> >> @@ -4323,7 +4364,7 @@ void rcutree_migrate_callbacks(int cpu)
> >>    my_rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
> >>    my_rnp = my_rdp->mynode;
> >>    rcu_nocb_lock(my_rdp); /* irqs already disabled. */
> >> -    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(my_rdp, NULL, jiffies));
> >> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(my_rdp, NULL, jiffies, FLUSH_BP_NONE));
> >>    raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(my_rnp); /* irqs already disabled. */
> >>    /* Leverage recent GPs and set GP for new callbacks. */
> >>    needwake = rcu_advance_cbs(my_rnp, rdp) ||
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> >> index d4a97e40ea9c..361c41d642c7 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> >> @@ -263,14 +263,16 @@ struct rcu_data {
> >>    unsigned long last_fqs_resched;    /* Time of last rcu_resched(). */
> >>    unsigned long last_sched_clock;    /* Jiffies of last rcu_sched_clock_irq(). */
> >> 
> >> +    long lazy_len;            /* Length of buffered lazy callbacks. */
> > 
> > Do we ever actually care about the length as opposed to whether or not all
> > the bypass callbacks are lazy?  If not, a "some_nonlazy" boolean would be
> > initialed to zero and ORed with the non-laziness of the added callback.
> > Or, if there was a test anyway, simply set to 1 in the presence of a
> > non-lazy callback.  And as now, gets zeroed when the bypass is flushed.
> 
> We had discussed this before, and my point was
> we could use it for tracing and future extension
> as well. If it’s ok with you, I prefer to keep it this
> way than having to come back add the length later.
> 
> On a minor point as well, if you really want it this
>  way,  I am afraid of changing this now since I tested
>  this way for last several iterations and it’s easy to
>  add a regression. So I prefer to keep it this way and
>  then I can add more patches later on top if that’s
>  Ok with you.

No, you are right, the debug information might be helpful.

But hey, at least I am consistent!

> > This might shorten a few lines of code.
> > 
> >>    int cpu;
> >> };
> >> 
> >> /* Values for nocb_defer_wakeup field in struct rcu_data. */
> >> #define RCU_NOCB_WAKE_NOT    0
> >> #define RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS    1
> >> -#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE        2
> >> -#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE_FORCE    3
> >> +#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY    2
> >> +#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE        3
> >> +#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE_FORCE    4
> >> 
> >> #define RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS (1 + (HZ > 250) + (HZ > 500))
> >>                    /* For jiffies_till_first_fqs and */
> >> @@ -439,10 +441,17 @@ static void zero_cpu_stall_ticks(struct rcu_data *rdp);
> >> static struct swait_queue_head *rcu_nocb_gp_get(struct rcu_node *rnp);
> >> static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct swait_queue_head *sq);
> >> static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp);
> >> +
> >> +#define FLUSH_BP_NONE 0
> >> +/* Is the CB being enqueued after the flush, a lazy CB? */
> >> +#define FLUSH_BP_LAZY BIT(0)
> >> +/* Wake up nocb-GP thread after flush? */
> >> +#define FLUSH_BP_WAKE BIT(1)
> >> static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >> -                  unsigned long j);
> >> +                  unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags);
> >> static bool rcu_nocb_try_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >> -                bool *was_alldone, unsigned long flags);
> >> +                bool *was_alldone, unsigned long flags,
> >> +                bool lazy);
> >> static void __call_rcu_nocb_wake(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool was_empty,
> >>                 unsigned long flags);
> >> static int rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp, int level);
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> >> index 18e9b4cd78ef..5cac05600798 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> >> @@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
> >> 
> >>    /* If expedited grace periods are prohibited, fall back to normal. */
> >>    if (rcu_gp_is_normal()) {
> >> -        wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
> >> +        wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_flush);
> >>        return;
> >>    }
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> >> index f77a6d7e1356..661c685aba3f 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> >> @@ -256,6 +256,31 @@ static bool wake_nocb_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool force)
> >>    return __wake_nocb_gp(rdp_gp, rdp, force, flags);
> >> }
> >> 
> >> +/*
> >> + * LAZY_FLUSH_JIFFIES decides the maximum amount of time that
> >> + * can elapse before lazy callbacks are flushed. Lazy callbacks
> >> + * could be flushed much earlier for a number of other reasons
> >> + * however, LAZY_FLUSH_JIFFIES will ensure no lazy callbacks are
> >> + * left unsubmitted to RCU after those many jiffies.
> >> + */
> >> +#define LAZY_FLUSH_JIFFIES (10 * HZ)
> >> +static unsigned long jiffies_till_flush = LAZY_FLUSH_JIFFIES;
> >> +
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> >> +// To be called only from test code.
> >> +void rcu_lazy_set_jiffies_till_flush(unsigned long jif)
> >> +{
> >> +    jiffies_till_flush = jif;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_lazy_set_jiffies_till_flush);
> >> +
> >> +unsigned long rcu_lazy_get_jiffies_till_flush(void)
> >> +{
> >> +    return jiffies_till_flush;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_lazy_get_jiffies_till_flush);
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> /*
> >>  * Arrange to wake the GP kthread for this NOCB group at some future
> >>  * time when it is safe to do so.
> >> @@ -269,10 +294,14 @@ static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
> >>    raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
> >> 
> >>    /*
> >> -     * Bypass wakeup overrides previous deferments. In case
> >> -     * of callback storm, no need to wake up too early.
> >> +     * Bypass wakeup overrides previous deferments. In case of
> >> +     * callback storm, no need to wake up too early.
> >>     */
> >> -    if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS) {
> >> +    if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY
> >> +        && READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_defer_wakeup) == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_NOT) {
> > 
> > Please leave the "&&" on the previous line and line up the "READ_ONCE("
> > with the "waketype".  That makes it easier to tell the condition from
> > the following code.
> 
> Will do!
> 
> > 
> >> +        mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer, jiffies + jiffies_till_flush);
> >> +        WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
> >> +    } else if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS) {
> >>        mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer, jiffies + 2);
> >>        WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
> >>    } else {
> >> @@ -293,12 +322,16 @@ static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
> >>  * proves to be initially empty, just return false because the no-CB GP
> >>  * kthread may need to be awakened in this case.
> >>  *
> >> + * Return true if there was something to be flushed and it succeeded, otherwise
> >> + * false.
> >> + *
> >>  * Note that this function always returns true if rhp is NULL.
> >>  */
> >> static bool rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >> -                     unsigned long j)
> >> +                     unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags)
> >> {
> >>    struct rcu_cblist rcl;
> >> +    bool lazy = flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_LAZY;
> >> 
> >>    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp));
> >>    rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
> >> @@ -310,7 +343,20 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >>    /* Note: ->cblist.len already accounts for ->nocb_bypass contents. */
> >>    if (rhp)
> >>        rcu_segcblist_inc_len(&rdp->cblist); /* Must precede enqueue. */
> >> -    rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue(&rcl, &rdp->nocb_bypass, rhp);
> >> +
> >> +    /*
> >> +     * If the new CB requested was a lazy one, queue it onto the main
> >> +     * ->cblist so we can take advantage of a sooner grade period.
> > 
> > "take advantage of a grace period that will happen regardless."?
> 
> Sure will update.
> 
> > 
> >> +     */
> >> +    if (lazy && rhp) {
> >> +        rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue(&rcl, &rdp->nocb_bypass, NULL);
> >> +        rcu_cblist_enqueue(&rcl, rhp);
> > 
> > Would it makes sense to enqueue rhp onto ->nocb_bypass first, NULL out
> > rhp, then let the rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue() be common code?  Or did this
> > function grow a later use of rhp that I missed?
> 
> No that could be done, but it prefer to keep it this
>  way because rhp is a function parameter and I
> prefer not to modify those since it could add a
> bug in future where rhp passed by user is now
> NULL for some reason, half way through the
> function.

I agree that changing a function parameter is bad practice.

So the question becomes whether introducing a local would outweigh
consolidating this code.  Could you please at least give it a shot?

> >> +        WRITE_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len, 0);
> >> +    } else {
> >> +        rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue(&rcl, &rdp->nocb_bypass, rhp);
> >> +        WRITE_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len, 0);
> > 
> > This WRITE_ONCE() can be dropped out of the "if" statement, correct?
> 
> Yes will update.

Thank you!

> > If so, this could be an "if" statement with two statements in its "then"
> > clause, no "else" clause, and two statements following the "if" statement.
> 
> I don’t think we can get rid of the else part but I’ll see what it looks like.

In the function header, s/rhp/rhp_in/, then:

	struct rcu_head *rhp = rhp_in;

And then:

	if (lazy && rhp) {
		rcu_cblist_enqueue(&rdp->nocb_bypass, rhp);
		rhp = NULL;
	}
	rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue(&rcl, &rdp->nocb_bypass, rhp);
	WRITE_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len, 0);

Or did I mess something up?

> >> +    }
> >> +
> >>    rcu_segcblist_insert_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist, &rcl);
> >>    WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_bypass_first, j);
> >>    rcu_nocb_bypass_unlock(rdp);
> >> @@ -326,13 +372,33 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >>  * Note that this function always returns true if rhp is NULL.
> >>  */
> >> static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >> -                  unsigned long j)
> >> +                  unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags)
> >> {
> >> +    bool ret;
> >> +    bool was_alldone = false;
> >> +    bool bypass_all_lazy = false;
> >> +    long bypass_ncbs;
> > 
> > Alphabetical order by variable name, please.  (Yes, I know that this is
> > strange, but what can I say?)
> 
> Sure.

Thank you!

> >> +
> >>    if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
> >>        return true;
> >>    rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
> >>    rcu_nocb_bypass_lock(rdp);
> >> -    return rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j);
> >> +
> >> +    if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE) {
> >> +        was_alldone = !rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
> >> +        bypass_ncbs = rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass);
> >> +        bypass_all_lazy = bypass_ncbs && (bypass_ncbs == rdp->lazy_len);
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    ret = rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j, flush_flags);
> >> +
> >> +    // Wake up the nocb GP thread if needed. GP thread could be sleeping
> >> +    // while waiting for lazy timer to expire (otherwise rcu_barrier may
> >> +    // end up waiting for the duration of the lazy timer).
> >> +    if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE && was_alldone && bypass_all_lazy)
> >> +        wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
> >> +
> >> +    return ret;
> >> }
> >> 
> >> /*
> >> @@ -345,7 +411,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_try_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, unsigned long j)
> >>    if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp) ||
> >>        !rcu_nocb_bypass_trylock(rdp))
> >>        return;
> >> -    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, j));
> >> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, j, FLUSH_BP_NONE));
> >> }
> >> 
> >> /*
> >> @@ -367,12 +433,14 @@ static void rcu_nocb_try_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, unsigned long j)
> >>  * there is only one CPU in operation.
> >>  */
> >> static bool rcu_nocb_try_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >> -                bool *was_alldone, unsigned long flags)
> >> +                bool *was_alldone, unsigned long flags,
> >> +                bool lazy)
> >> {
> >>    unsigned long c;
> >>    unsigned long cur_gp_seq;
> >>    unsigned long j = jiffies;
> >>    long ncbs = rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass);
> >> +    bool bypass_is_lazy = (ncbs == READ_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len));
> >> 
> >>    lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> >> 
> >> @@ -417,25 +485,30 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_try_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >>    // If there hasn't yet been all that many ->cblist enqueues
> >>    // this jiffy, tell the caller to enqueue onto ->cblist.  But flush
> >>    // ->nocb_bypass first.
> >> -    if (rdp->nocb_nobypass_count < nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy) {
> >> +    // Lazy CBs throttle this back and do immediate bypass queuing.
> >> +    if (rdp->nocb_nobypass_count < nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy && !lazy) {
> >>        rcu_nocb_lock(rdp);
> >>        *was_alldone = !rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
> >>        if (*was_alldone)
> >>            trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu,
> >>                        TPS("FirstQ"));
> >> -        WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, j));
> >> +
> >> +        WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, j, FLUSH_BP_NONE));
> >>        WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass));
> >>        return false; // Caller must enqueue the callback.
> >>    }
> >> 
> >>    // If ->nocb_bypass has been used too long or is too full,
> >>    // flush ->nocb_bypass to ->cblist.
> >> -    if ((ncbs && j != READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_bypass_first)) ||
> >> +    if ((ncbs && !bypass_is_lazy && j != READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_bypass_first)) ||
> >> +        (ncbs &&  bypass_is_lazy &&
> >> +        (time_after(j, READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_bypass_first) + jiffies_till_flush))) ||
> >>        ncbs >= qhimark) {
> >>        rcu_nocb_lock(rdp);
> >>        *was_alldone = !rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
> >> 
> >> -        if (!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j)) {
> >> +        if (!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j,
> >> +                       lazy ? FLUSH_BP_LAZY : FLUSH_BP_NONE)) {
> >>            if (*was_alldone)
> >>                trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu,
> >>                            TPS("FirstQ"));
> >> @@ -460,16 +533,29 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_try_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >>    // We need to use the bypass.
> >>    rcu_nocb_wait_contended(rdp);
> >>    rcu_nocb_bypass_lock(rdp);
> >> +
> >>    ncbs = rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass);
> >>    rcu_segcblist_inc_len(&rdp->cblist); /* Must precede enqueue. */
> >>    rcu_cblist_enqueue(&rdp->nocb_bypass, rhp);
> >> +
> >> +    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY) && lazy)
> > 
> > Won't !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY) mean that lazy cannot be set?
> > Why do we need to check both?  Or are you going for dead code?  If so,
> > shouldn't there be IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY) checks above as well?
> > 
> > Me, I am not convinced that the dead code would buy you much.  In fact,
> > the compiler might well be propagating the constants on its own.
> > 
> > Ah!  The reason the compiler cannot figure this out is because you put
> > the switch into rcu.h.  If you instead always export the call_rcu_flush()
> > definition, and check IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY) at the beginning of
> > call_rcu(), the compiler should have the information that it needs to
> > do this for you.
> 
> Ah ok, I will try to do it this way.

Very good, thank you, for this and for the rest below.

							Thanx, Paul

> >> +        WRITE_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len, rdp->lazy_len + 1);
> >> +
> >>    if (!ncbs) {
> >>        WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_bypass_first, j);
> >>        trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, TPS("FirstBQ"));
> >>    }
> >> +
> >>    rcu_nocb_bypass_unlock(rdp);
> >>    smp_mb(); /* Order enqueue before wake. */
> >> -    if (ncbs) {
> >> +
> >> +    // A wake up of the grace period kthread or timer adjustment needs to
> >> +    // be done only if:
> >> +    // 1. Bypass list was fully empty before (this is the first bypass list entry).
> >> +    //    Or, both the below conditions are met:
> >> +    // 1. Bypass list had only lazy CBs before.
> >> +    // 2. The new CB is non-lazy.
> >> +    if (ncbs && (!bypass_is_lazy || lazy)) {
> >>        local_irq_restore(flags);
> >>    } else {
> >>        // No-CBs GP kthread might be indefinitely asleep, if so, wake.
> >> @@ -499,7 +585,7 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_wake(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool was_alldone,
> >> {
> >>    unsigned long cur_gp_seq;
> >>    unsigned long j;
> >> -    long len;
> >> +    long len, lazy_len, bypass_len;
> >>    struct task_struct *t;
> > 
> > Again, alphabetical please, strange though that might seem.
> 
> Yes sure
> 
> > 
> >>    // If we are being polled or there is no kthread, just leave.
> >> @@ -512,9 +598,16 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_wake(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool was_alldone,
> >>    }
> >>    // Need to actually to a wakeup.
> >>    len = rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
> >> +    bypass_len = rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass);
> >> +    lazy_len = READ_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len);
> >>    if (was_alldone) {
> >>        rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = len;
> >> -        if (!irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {
> >> +        // Only lazy CBs in bypass list
> >> +        if (lazy_len && bypass_len == lazy_len) {
> >> +            rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
> >> +            wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY,
> >> +                       TPS("WakeLazy"));
> >> +        } else if (!irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {
> >>            /* ... if queue was empty ... */
> >>            rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
> >>            wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
> >> @@ -604,8 +697,8 @@ static void nocb_gp_sleep(struct rcu_data *my_rdp, int cpu)
> >>  */
> >> static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
> >> {
> >> -    bool bypass = false;
> >> -    long bypass_ncbs;
> >> +    bool bypass = false, lazy = false;
> >> +    long bypass_ncbs, lazy_ncbs;
> > 
> > And ditto.
> 
> Ok
> 
> > 
> >>    int __maybe_unused cpu = my_rdp->cpu;
> >>    unsigned long cur_gp_seq;
> >>    unsigned long flags;
> >> @@ -640,24 +733,41 @@ static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
> >>     * won't be ignored for long.
> >>     */
> >>    list_for_each_entry(rdp, &my_rdp->nocb_head_rdp, nocb_entry_rdp) {
> >> +        bool flush_bypass = false;
> >> +
> >>        trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, TPS("Check"));
> >>        rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
> >>        lockdep_assert_held(&rdp->nocb_lock);
> >>        bypass_ncbs = rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass);
> >> -        if (bypass_ncbs &&
> >> +        lazy_ncbs = READ_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len);
> >> +
> >> +        if (bypass_ncbs && (lazy_ncbs == bypass_ncbs) &&
> >> +            (time_after(j, READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_bypass_first) + jiffies_till_flush) ||
> >> +             bypass_ncbs > 2 * qhimark)) {
> >> +            flush_bypass = true;
> >> +        } else if (bypass_ncbs && (lazy_ncbs != bypass_ncbs) &&
> >>            (time_after(j, READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_bypass_first) + 1) ||
> >>             bypass_ncbs > 2 * qhimark)) {
> >> -            // Bypass full or old, so flush it.
> >> -            (void)rcu_nocb_try_flush_bypass(rdp, j);
> >> -            bypass_ncbs = rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass);
> >> +            flush_bypass = true;
> >>        } else if (!bypass_ncbs && rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist)) {
> >>            rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
> >>            continue; /* No callbacks here, try next. */
> >>        }
> >> +
> >> +        if (flush_bypass) {
> >> +            // Bypass full or old, so flush it.
> >> +            (void)rcu_nocb_try_flush_bypass(rdp, j);
> >> +            bypass_ncbs = rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass);
> >> +            lazy_ncbs = READ_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len);
> >> +        }
> >> +
> >>        if (bypass_ncbs) {
> >>            trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu,
> >> -                        TPS("Bypass"));
> >> -            bypass = true;
> >> +                    bypass_ncbs == lazy_ncbs ? TPS("Lazy") : TPS("Bypass"));
> >> +            if (bypass_ncbs == lazy_ncbs)
> >> +                lazy = true;
> >> +            else
> >> +                bypass = true;
> >>        }
> >>        rnp = rdp->mynode;
> >> 
> >> @@ -705,12 +815,21 @@ static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
> >>    my_rdp->nocb_gp_gp = needwait_gp;
> >>    my_rdp->nocb_gp_seq = needwait_gp ? wait_gp_seq : 0;
> >> 
> >> -    if (bypass && !rcu_nocb_poll) {
> >> -        // At least one child with non-empty ->nocb_bypass, so set
> >> -        // timer in order to avoid stranding its callbacks.
> >> -        wake_nocb_gp_defer(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS,
> >> -                   TPS("WakeBypassIsDeferred"));
> >> +    // At least one child with non-empty ->nocb_bypass, so set
> >> +    // timer in order to avoid stranding its callbacks.
> >> +    if (!rcu_nocb_poll) {
> >> +        // If bypass list only has lazy CBs. Add a deferred
> >> +        // lazy wake up.
> > 
> > One sentence rather than two.
> 
> Ok
> 
> > 
> >> +        if (lazy && !bypass) {
> >> +            wake_nocb_gp_defer(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY,
> >> +                    TPS("WakeLazyIsDeferred"));
> >> +        // Otherwise add a deferred bypass wake up.
> >> +        } else if (bypass) {
> >> +            wake_nocb_gp_defer(my_rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS,
> >> +                    TPS("WakeBypassIsDeferred"));
> >> +        }
> >>    }
> >> +
> >>    if (rcu_nocb_poll) {
> >>        /* Polling, so trace if first poll in the series. */
> >>        if (gotcbs)
> >> @@ -1036,7 +1155,7 @@ static long rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(void *arg)
> >>     * return false, which means that future calls to rcu_nocb_try_bypass()
> >>     * will refuse to put anything into the bypass.
> >>     */
> >> -    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, jiffies));
> >> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, jiffies, FLUSH_BP_NONE));
> >>    /*
> >>     * Start with invoking rcu_core() early. This way if the current thread
> >>     * happens to preempt an ongoing call to rcu_core() in the middle,
> >> @@ -1278,6 +1397,7 @@ static void __init rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> >>    raw_spin_lock_init(&rdp->nocb_gp_lock);
> >>    timer_setup(&rdp->nocb_timer, do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_timer, 0);
> >>    rcu_cblist_init(&rdp->nocb_bypass);
> >> +    WRITE_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len, 0);
> >>    mutex_init(&rdp->nocb_gp_kthread_mutex);
> >> }
> >> 
> >> @@ -1559,13 +1679,13 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> >> }
> >> 
> >> static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >> -                  unsigned long j)
> >> +                  unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags)
> >> {
> >>    return true;
> >> }
> >> 
> >> static bool rcu_nocb_try_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >> -                bool *was_alldone, unsigned long flags)
> >> +                bool *was_alldone, unsigned long flags, bool lazy)
> >> {
> >>    return false;
> >> }
> >> -- 
> >> 2.37.3.998.g577e59143f-goog
> >> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ