linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:54:25 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64

On 25/09/2022 13:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 25 September 2022 14:21:03 GMT+03:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>> There is no point to allow selecting pin-controller drivers for Qualcomm
>> ARMv7 SoCs when building ARM64 kernel, and vice versa.  This makes
>> kernel configuration more difficult as many do not remember the Qualcomm
>> SoCs.  There won't be a single image for ARMv7 and ARMv8/9 SoCs, so no
>> features/options are lost.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> I haven't checked which restrictions apply to msm8916 at this moment, but it might be worth adding 'depends on ARM || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST'

This is limited by ARCH_QCOM (top-level if in the file), so I am not
sure what would be benefits.

Best regards,
Krzysztof